Participant Survey

ECR Development Workshop Survey

ECR Development Workshop Survey

Please fax, email or post this EII ECR Development Workshop Survey by 30 September

Fax: Kathleen Williamson, EII, 07-3365 4999

Post: Kathleen Williamson, EII, School of Information Technology & Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane Q 4072

Please rate using this scale:

1	2	3	4	5
very low	low	neutral	high	very high

How satisfied are you?

	1	2	3	4	5
With the overall quality of the workshop?
With the scope of the information presented?
You had sufficient time to network and share ideas with other delegates?
With the workshop’s overall value in helping improve your research effectiveness?
That the workshop helped encourage research collaboration?
That the workshop was an inspirational experience for you?
That the workshop treated you as an adult learner and as a collaborative colleague?
That the workshop has provided new ideas for your research?

Please rate using this scale:

1	2	3	4	5
very low	low	neutral	high	very high

Please circle the rating for the specific ECR Development Workshop topics:

	Peer Presentations	Session with Senior Researchers	Session with ARC Insiders	Special Interest Group Discussions	Foundation Theme Elements of Research
My background knowledge at the start of the workshop	N/A	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5
Relevance/interest/usefulness to me	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5
Quality & effectiveness of session	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5
My understanding has increased	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5
My interest has developed	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5
The learning experience was interesting and thought-provoking	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5
There were adequate opportunities to share ideas, to consult with, and to engage in scholarly discussion with senior researchers & other delegates	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5
Overall	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5	1 2 3 4 5

Please rate using this scale:

1	2	3	4	5
very low	low	neutral	high	very high

Please circle the rating of the ECR Development Workshop Administration and Organization:

	Rating	Comments
Classroom Facilities	1 2 3 4 5	______________________________
Catering (meals)	1 2 3 4 5	______________________________
Accommodation Facilities	1 2 3 4 5	______________________________
Financial Support	1 2 3 4 5	______________________________
Internet Access	1 2 3 4 5	______________________________
Technical Facilities for presentations	1 2 3 4 5	______________________________
Overall organisation	1 2 3 4 5	______________________________

Do you have any specific comments?

What were the major strengths of the workshop?
What were the major weaknesses?
What topics would you like to see presented at a future ECR workshop?
Was the program structured well? If not, do you have suggestions?
Was it a beneficial experience for you to attend the workshop as an “in-house” delegate at a remote location? Why?
Would you prefer that a social program was organized for delegates?
How did you find out about the ECR Workshop?
Would you recommend the ECR Workshop to others? Yes q No q If not, please briefly indicate why:
When the ECR Workshop is run again, what changes would you suggest to improve it for participants?
Thank you for your feedback. If you would like to make additional comments, please go ahead.

Attachment	Size
Survey06.pdf	121.24 KB
2006ECRSurvey.doc	222 KB

Upcoming Events